KRISS VECTOR SUSPENSION: ORIGIN ‘OOPS!’

Posted on by Faith Goldy in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

A very brief summary of where we left off:
- RCMP confirms Swiss Arms Classic Green is under re-examination

- According to RCMP, no other firearms are under re-examination (note: KRISS Vector and CZ 858 were mentioned by name in media request)

- Reports that the KRISS Vector FRT number was removed

HERE IS WHAT’S NEW:

In my latest email exchange with RCMP, I asked if the KRISS Vector FRT number had been suspended and, if so, why? Here’s what Corporal David Falls tells us:

“The RCMP’s Canadian Firearms Program (CFP) is not reviewing its previous expert opinion on the classification of the Swiss KRISS Vector.  A new version, made by KRISS USA, has been introduced into the market, and is being assessed by the CFP so that it can be legally registered, if necessary, and sold in Canada. This is a routine activity of the CFP, which assesses over 3700 new firearms each year in order to fulfil its registration mandate under the Firearm Act.”

The exchange corroborates with what John from North Sylva told me earlier… You’ll recall in a previous post, I mentioned what came of my correspondence with John regarding the KRISS Vector specifically:

- John says he’s in regular contact with RCMP and they are hoping to restore FRT # within 60 days

- Kriss Vector is not under re-examination according to his knowledge

- ***RCMP say this was based on a misunderstanding of the origin of firearm
***

- Retail of KRISS Vector suspended for now

It’s the penultimate point that’s most important here. It seems as though, in importing a new version of the KRISS Vector, one made by KRISS USA, the RCMP/CFP– in their infinite wisdom– suspended the FRT # of the Swiss KRISS Vector in the meantime… Despite having already passed initial RCMP classification.

If you are a KRISS owner, let me know if/how this has impacted you below!

 

SWISS ARMS, KRISS VECTOR, CZ 858: SOME ANSWERS

Posted on by Faith Goldy in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

I received an email from RCMP Corporal David Falls today…

In it, an explanation for the re-examination of the Swiss Arms Classic Green rifle:

“The Canadian Firearms Program is currently reviewing the Swiss Arms PE90 Classic Green rifle following a complaint from a firearms business client. The review will be based on the criteria in the Criminal Code and in the Regulations Prescribing Certain Firearms and other Weapons, Components and Parts of Weapons, Accessories, Cartridge Magazines, Ammunitions and Projectiles as Prohibited or Restricted.

In previous correspondence, I asked if the Kriss Vector and CZ 858 were up for re-examination as well? Here’s what RCMP tell us:

 ”There are no reviews currently being conducted on any other firearms.”

However, we know from the following CanadianGunNutz post by North_Sylva that the Kriss Vector had its FRT number pulled.

North_Sylva wrote:

Info regarding KRISS FRT#

We just wanted to clear the air in light of the current situation in the Canadian firearms community regarding the pulling of FRT numbers.

The big question is “Has the FRT # for the KRISS Vector been pulled?”

The short answer is yes. The FRT number has been pulled, but the firearm is not considered prohibited.

We are currently working with the RCMP to get this issue resolved, and I have no doubt that everything with this particular firearm will be back to normal shortly.

There are a lot of rumors circulating at the moment, and I don’t want any misinformation regarding the KRISS firearm floating around.

We have suspended the sale of this firearm until the issue is resolved.

Thanks,

The North Sylva Co.

I spoke with John from North Sylva, he confirmed the Kriss Vector FRT number is temporarily suspended. Here’s what else he told me:

- John says he’s in regular contact w RCMP, says they’re hoping to restore FRT # within 60 days

- Kriss Vector is not under re-examination according to his knowledge

- RCMP say this was based on a misunderstanding of the origin of firearm
- Retail of Kriss Vector suspended for now

Following the above correspondence, I put in a request to RCMP for an official statement on WHY the Kriss Vector saw its FRT number suspended. Will let you know as soon as I receive word!

UPDATE: SWISS ARMS IN RCMP SIGHTS?

Posted on by Faith Goldy in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

An update now to my previous post about the RCMP gunning to reclassify certain Swiss Arms rifles…

EMAIL CONTACT WITH RCMP AND PUBLIC SAFETY MINISTER:

In an e-mail addressed to me, RCMP Sergeant Greg Cox wrote the following:

“The CFP is reviewing the status of the Swiss Arms PE Classic Green. The review is currently underway.”

Safe to say then, Classic Green is being targeted but RCMP is mum on whether or not Swiss Arms Black Special is in their sights as well.

Recall that RCMP requires Cabinet to reclassify a firearm, unless the firearm is deemed a variant of another prohibited firearm or considered ‘easily convertible‘ (whatever that means… Law doesn’t specify).

When I asked whether the CFP considers the rifles as variants of the Sig-550, Cox wrote:

“These firearms are still under review.”

(Note: The Sergeant mentions firearms– plural– so the question still stands as to whether or not Black Special is also up for re-examination…)

A 2010 RCMP memo has been revealed under the Access to Information Act which seems to indicate a broader reclassification agenda.  Since RCMP falls under the purview of the Ministry of Public Safety, I asked whether Minister Vic Toews would stand idly by if ANOTHER firearm were to be reclassified to the prohibited class (recall: 6 firearms have been reclassified from non-restricted to prohibited under the Harper Government, some even after the long-gun registry was abolished by Parliamentary edict).

Here’s what  Press Secretary for the Minister of Public Safety Andrew McGrath wrote in response:

“We expect that the applicable rules and regulations will be applied appropriately and no unreasonable burden will be placed on law-abiding firearms owners. We will always place the safety of the public first and work to ensure that the rights of gun owners are respected.”

Take that as you will.

MY THOUGHTS:

  • Reclassification means confiscation when the firearm in question is moved to the prohibited class. Your firearm changes, your license cannot.
  • 12 years after initial investigation in RCMP labs, the firearm in question– the facts– have not changed, only RCMP opinion has changed.
  • A disconnect: Civilian RCMP OPINION (i.e. FRT numbers) is taken as law. RCMP opinion– the FRT is NOT a statute or regulation– which can change (?!), carries with it the full weight of the law… Including a possible 3 year prison sentence! (not to mention reverse onus bail)!

Whether there is a voluntary buy-back or RCMP obtain warrants to the retail records of over 1200 firearms dealers in Canada to track down who owns these firearms, something is wrong when law-abiding gun owners can be turned into paperwork criminals– without the consent of Cabinet– because the RCMP changes its mind.

For the sake of firearms owners of the present and future, perhaps it’s time for an independent review of RCMP classification procedures.

WATCH: Faith Goldy and Brian Lilley on the RCMP’s latest move.

RCMP GUNNING TO BAN NON-RESTRICTED RIFLE?

Posted on by Faith Goldy in Uncategorized | 13 Comments

A recent post by Alberta Tactical Rifle Supply on a Canadian firearms forum indicates the RCMP is moving to ban a previously non-restricted rifle: Swiss Arms Black and Green Rifles.

These models have been selling in Canada for at least a decade and, although the RCMP have not officially communicated the ban, here’s what I make of it after speaking with Blair Hagen from the NFA.

- Right now, this particular ban is a rumour; however, based on RCMP record as of late, the question is one of immenence not veracity.
- The move is part of a broader re-classification agenda by RCMP, c. 2010 (several rifles already banned [e.g., Norinco Type 97A]. Difference is: Previously banned firearms were restricted, limited in number). RCMP’s target? Semi-auto rifles.
- RCMP’s rationale? Swiss Arms Black and Green Rifles are easily convertible to full-auto.
- RCMP is likely acting alone. Since the end of the long-gun registry… They have been using their own labs to test specific firearms for modification capabilities.
- RCMP’s legal leg? R. v. Hasselwander (Easy modifications to full auto? Ban them.)

I know what you’re thinking… Swiss Arms Black and Green Rifles are non-restricted– there is no record of possession. Any confiscation or compensation (which would be a lot, these puppies cost a pretty penny) would be based on voluntary grounds of the owner.

Not so!

RCMP already indicated how they treat non-registered firearms confiscation during the 1990s (pre-registry days, post C-17 when a swath of semis were banned outright).

RCMP go to retailers, forcibly obtain the permanent firearms sales records and GO TO THE LAST LISTED ADDRESS OF PURCHASER!

Prior to importation, RCMP is required to test firearms. Safe to say they did this with the Swiss over a decade ago. But now they’ve changed their minds. Then the RCMP should wear this– NOT law-abiding gun owners.

Stop the gunstapo before they arrive on your stoop: Spread the word.

LORD BLACK ON THE IRON LADY

Posted on by Faith Goldy in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

My exclusive television interview with Conrad Black on Margaret Thatcher.

 

539153_639111206105466_1701655135_n

 

Enjoy!

DEFENDING DEFUNDING

Posted on by Faith Goldy in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Below, my speech from Ontario’s 2013 Defund Abortion Rally:

To begin, let me be clear: I am not here as a representative of my employer. I am here as a child of God, a citizen of this great country, and a resident of this vast province.

I have always been a political animal: someone who believes in personal liberty. And, I have always been a woman: one who encourages other women to think freely. But I have not always been pro-life.

There is a saintly man… A famed Canadian pro-life priest who witnesses to the sanctity of life on Parliament Hill every day that Parliament has sat since September of 1989. When I was 14 years old, on a school trip to our nation’s capital, I strayed from my class-crowd and struck up an antagonistic conversation with Fr. Van Hee. Well, less a conversation of any depth or meaning, more like a string of chants I had heard before, “Keep your rosaries out of my ovaries… You don’t have a uterus, you can’t tell me what to do with mine. Fr. Van Hee, a slight man, stood over me quietly, patiently— until my teacher grabbed me, very nearly by the collar, placing me in line with my peers.

The second time I encountered Fr. Van Hee was last spring. This time, I towered over him. An outstretched hand at first, then a hug… I reminded him of our first meeting… I told him I had since seen the light of life. I apologized. He forgave me. I thanked him for praying for me— I know he did— we both had tears in our eyes.

A lot happened in those 10 years, but it’s too cold out here to cover everything.

Put simply, a growth in faith and exposure to facts revealed: All liberty depends on life.

Many think that if you support individual rights, free markets, and limited government, you should be “pro-choice.”

These views are flawed.

There is no right more basic than life. This fundamental right to life extends to the unborn, never mind that they are voiceless and defenseless (many children and elderly are, too). Abortion involves intentionally killing a helpless, innocent human being. And that is murder.

My friends, we live in a province— in a nation— that views murder as a constitutional right.

One that is justifies itself with an attitude that says, ‘If you don’t like abortion, don’t have one… Just pay for mine.’

Worse yet, generations of women are being educated to equate a right to murder their child, with their own liberty as a female. What rights do women have without life? None. All liberty depends on life.

But, make no mistake. Girls, grown women are fed a rich diet of the ‘my body, my choice mantra. (Er, it’s not just your body… The fetus has a different DNA structure and blood type, not to mention ultrasound abortions show a separate body within your womb backing away from the instrument that is about to cause it pain and eventually tear it apart, takes its life away…. But I digress.)

The opposing voice to this mantra — one that tries to educate young women, in truth, about their bodies, and the other body that is within them— the sanctity, the dignity, the LIFE within them both— that voice is now threatened within Ontario schools.

Ontario’s Education Minister recently called the pro-life stance ‘misogynistic’. “Bill 13 is about tackling misogyny,” she said. “Taking away a woman’s right to choose could arguably be one of the most misogynistic actions that one could take.” This has since stoked concerns that this Liberal government wants to dictate what Catholics can and cannot teach.

And, as a side note here, enough of this nonsense that life is a Catholics-only issue… Until recently, the two main strands of Western Civilization—Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian— agreed that abortion is wrong.

But, getting back to Education Minister Laurel Broten…

‘Misogynistic’… Really? What an ignorant thing to say. Either Minister Broten is ignorant of the meaning of the word— which alludes to being inspired by a hatred of women— or, she is ignorant of how abortion effects women, in which case she would be far from alone.

See, if you have not had an abortion or participated in one in some capacity, you may not have witnessed the direct effects of this holocaust— but we all experience it indirectly: a widening gap between childbearing and sex, and an expanding culture of death in which human life is less and less sacred…

But, woah! Hold my Heavenly horses… I don’t want to get too preachy before the good folks of our provincial legislature. So let me be clear…

Abortion, my friends, is a real war on women.

I know, I know, the word “choice” sounds friendly to me as the left-wing-fringe minority group member that I am, being a woman an all.

But, isn’t well-informed “choice” the best choice?

And since this isn’t an Ontario Catholic school micromanaged by pro-murder bureaucratic bullies, why not elucidate that choice now?

Abortions don’t just hurt the human whose life they end… Abortions hurt women who undergo the procedure.

According to Forbidden Grief: The Unspoken Pain of Abortion, 64% of women who had abortions report that they felt pressured to abort by others.

And as with any medical procedure, there are risks. The most common immediate and short-term risks include infection, failure to extract all “products of conception” (i.e. retained fetal or placental tissue), bleeding and even death.

And complications from an abortion may surface as many as 10 to15 years later.  A survey of women conducted 15 years after their abortions found that 75% regretted having the abortion and by their own testimony, said they made the wrong choice. 65% of women experienced multiple symptoms of PTSD… And I haven’t even touched on the increased likelihood of breast cancer, ectopic pregnancies, uterine perforation (which can cause infertility), and the higher chance of future offspring being born prematurely (while cerebral palsy and other disabilities result from prematurity).

Further still, one authoritative study completed in Finland found that suicide rates associated with abortion are 6 times higher than the suicide rate associated with childbirth. That same study established women who undergo induced abortion experience a death rate nearly 4 times greater than women who give birth.

Friends, the promise of “safe and legal abortions” has failed.

For decades, women have not been told the truth about the development of the unborn child or the potential risk they face. Many who support the right of a woman to murder her own child have good intentions but are unaware of the risk these women will face.

There has, thus, been a war waged on women. One that seeks to keep her in the dark about the so-called choice she makes.

A choice to murder her child.

A choice to place her own health at risk.

And today, in Ontario, there is a threat to future generations as our education system suggest limitations be put upon disagreement with this culture of death…

Imagine: Pro-life teachings, against the law in Ontario’s new era of Bill 13…

How free is a nation where the freedom of speech for one is favoured over the freedom of speech for another simply because the one is more ‘comfortable’ to talk about?

As it stands, my government is taking my money to pay for murder, even though it violates my constitutional freedoms of religion and conscience.  Now, my government wants to turn tax-funded schools— spaces where students ought to be exposed a wide range of ideas—into echo chambers. That, my friends, is not education. That is not freedom.

Today, I have come to our province’s legislature with a message—no matter how uncomfortable— for our premier….

Premier Kathleen Wynne: As Ontario’s first openly gay, female leader, I pray you do not find yourself confined by the false grouping, manufactured by the media and mainstream, that knots together issues of sexual orientation with matters of life and abortion. Outside of Scripture, these two issues have no common ground. Instead, I beg you to place woman’s rights at the forefront of your focus while in government. For, after all, women’s rights are human rights. And the first and most fundamental human right is the right to life.

Thank you.

MSM MISSING THE MARK ON FLANAGAN FILTH

Posted on by Faith Goldy in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

With so many folks in a fury over the demented comments made by CBC commentator and University of Calgary professor, Tom Flanagan, you would think the story is pretty much covered.

Well, think again.

Here are Flanagan’s comments at Lethridge in their entirety.

So, THIS is the quote the mainstream remains focused on:

“I certainly have no sympathy for child molesters, but I do have some grave doubts about putting people in jail because of their taste in pictures. I don’t look at these pictures.”

Analysis of the quote has ranged from Alberta Premier Redford’s salient comment, suggesting this is what taking ideology to extremes looks like, to die-hard-free-speechers who think Flanagan had ‘no reason to apologize.’

When really the media, critics, the University of Calgary, et al should focus on THIS quote from that same clip:

“At one point in my career… it’s a long story, but I got put on the National Man Boy Love Association, and I started getting their mailings for a couple years, that’s the closest I ever came to child pornography.”

See here, the media has burried the lede.

And it’s not the first time. Here‘s Flanagan calling child pornography “JUST PICTURES” in 2009… Cue the mum media.

However Flanagan’s unsolicited mention of NAMBLA is what differentiates his comment in early 2013 from his comments four years before.

For those unfamiliar with the perverted organization, which seeks to normalize pedophilia as a legitimate orientation…

Here’s how NAMBLA is described on Wikipedia:

  • “The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is a PEDOPHILE and PEDASTRY ADVOCACY ORGANIZATION in the United States that works to ABOLISH AGE OF CONSENT LAWS criminalizing adult sexual involvement with minors, and for the RELEASE of all men who have been jailed for SEXUAL CONACTS WITH MINORS that did not involve coersion.”
  • “NAMBLA is perceived as a front for the CRIMINAL SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN, functioning as a MEETING PLACE for male PEDOPHILES and pedasts and their sympathizers.”
  • “Law enforcement officials and mental health professionals say that while NAMBLA’s membership numbers are small, the group has a DANGEROUS RIPPLE EFFECT through the Internet by SANCTIONING the BEHAVIOUR OF THOSE WHO ABUSE CHILDREN.”

Folks online also seem to think the motto of NAMBLA is, “Sex before eight or it’s too late,” however, I’m having trouble finding any such evidence on the group’s website.

You’ll notice the link I posted there connects to the ‘Join’ page.

Why?

Well, Flanagan’s “… I got put on the National Man Boy Love Association, and I started getting their mailings for a couple years…” doesn’t seem like accidental spam when you consider the YEARLY MEMBERSHIP FEE NECESSARY to recieve their filth mailings.

But I digress…

Back to what changed between these recent comments and his pro-kiddie-porn statement circa ’09…

Why the change?

Why would an otherwise intelligent man insist on conveying he is party to such a mailing list– amid boos and without provocation?

Unless, quite plausibly, Flanagan was provoked.

Perhaps someone knew of his affinity for photographs of young, nude children and threatened to sound the alarm. But instead, Flanagan pulled the trigger on himself.

This is more than liberatarian logic run amok. This very well might necessitate a criminal investigation and the University of Calgary, as well as police in that region, have a duty to search the disgraced professor’s home, office, and computers.

Call me old fashioned, but I’d rather see ALL child abusers– because that’s what child pornography is: abuse of children– exposed,  convicted, and tracked.

Office of Religious Freedom Wish List

Posted on by Faith Goldy in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Twenty two months after their initial pledge, the federal government is expected to unveil its Office of Religious Freedom today.

The announcement will take place at Ahmadiyya Muslim Community Centre and Mosque, a complex in Vaughan, ON. International Co-operation Minister Julian Fantino, MP for Vaughan, is expected to stand in for Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird, who is on a six nation tour in Latin America.

The promise, part of the Conservative platform during the last federal campaign, to create a modest religious freedom branch within DFAIT is expected to prioritize the protection of religious minorities under threat and the promotion of Canadian pluralism abroad. And the office comes with a $5 million dollar price tag, $500,000 set aside for operations.

While Foreign Affairs has yet to name Canada’s first Abassador for Religious Freedom, here’s a short list of what I’m hoping will come with today’s announcement:

- Acknowledgement that the US already has an office by the same name, which serves primarily as a database about religious persecution abroad. Commonsense suggests there is no need to reinvent the wheel; therefore, our office might take on an increasinly active, rather than contemplative, role.

- $5 million isn’t enough to rid the world of religious persecution; however, I hope a legal defense fund for individuals who face trial in the name of religion (e.g.  Blasphemy Laws in Pakistan and Egypt) is included.

- Lastly, a sunset clause. $5 million isn’t enough to accomplish a whole lot on the Hill, but if in a period of five or ten years, that money is found to be doing nothing at all, the office ought to be closed.

My prayer is that this office is not marred by political correctness (a nightmare: “Well, $35,000 was alotted to Christian causes last month, we ought to ensure Muslims have an equal share.”) Instead, this office might serve as a signal to our international friends and foes that freedom of conscience and religion is fundamental to Canadian values. And, if we can stop or shed light on Coptic Christians killed in Egypt, Baha’i persecutiuon in Iran, or Roman Catholic priests forced underground in China (to list only a few examples)–  they will be tax dollars well spent.

FAITH’S POPE PICKS…

Posted on by Faith Goldy in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

With Pope Benedict XVI resigning on 28 February, 121 Cardinals will elect a new Pope before Easter Sunday of 2013.

Some Popetrivia:

Last pope to resign was in 1415.
121 out of over 200 Cardinals from around the world are eligible to vote (must be under 80).
No electronics allowed into conclave under threat of excommunication.
When black smoke turns to white, a new Pope is elected.

My picks:

FRONT RUNNERS
- CARDINAL PETER KODWO APPIAH TURKSON, GHANA, 64
- CARDINAL ANGELO SCOLA, ITALY, 71
- CARDINAL MARC OULETT, CANADA, 68

MIDDLE OF THE PACK:
- CARDINAL LEONARDO SANDRI, ARGENTINA, 69
- CARDINAL TIMOTHY DOLAN, AMERICA, 63
- CARDINAL ANGELO BAGNASCO, ITALY, 70

LONG SHOTS:
- CARDINAL ANTONIO CANIZARES LLOVERA, ITALY, 67
- CARDINAL GEORGE PELL, AUSTRALIA, 70
- CARDINAL TARSICIO BERTONE, ITALY, 78

But it’s the Holy Spirit’s pick that counts.

LOCK, STOCK AND A FEW SMOKING MEMES

Posted on by Faith Goldy in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

29604_476894795694920_94291518_n 14407_464911870218118_741381146_n 47357_453140401412233_1407082975_n 64658_452665518126388_1144896278_n 68852_551291741565046_1738808881_n 291766_4311246817543_2111158918_n 264758_407877469294490_411877441_n 300047_4357037722287_497337761_n 308873_464024040303214_1382519591_n 389919_365130853568841_604916184_n 381845_431748600205815_737324623_n 406401_463343840373095_2124891408_n 418934_430214243686319_2085265962_n  538797_444391045612148_234046437_n 530427_407874969294740_303433005_n 543856_506260336075568_837400269_n 547431_504669246222676_631544166_n 558327_10151075839319371_1523041099_n 644654_10151304660521833_802629977_n 552148_10151127082039371_1882227472_n 578522_10151155797274371_60413963_n 559069_402425723153603_1126976864_n 577086_458959057480066_918189548_n 558934_453562264706350_1780239881_n